Skip to main content

One Piece at a Time

A long time ago, I remember walking by the common area on a floor where I didn't work. It was interesting to see their various artifacts and practices on display, in particular because they didn't necessarily line up with what I was used to with my team. It was like visiting another country, and I was a sightseer that got to visit for a little while.

This was a while ago, so I don't really remember the little things. However, I do remember that they had a communal puzzle. The whole thing was set up on a table in full view of the entire team, and I got the impression that people were encouraged to work on it whenever they had a free moment. What's more, there were other completed puzzles in various places, so I could see that this wasn't just a whim.

On the one hand, this puzzle thing made total sense to me. I was the one who had an ongoing chess game with my coworker, remember? Spreading the fun around seemed perfectly reasonable. On the other hand, though, I'd never seen it in practice. I was vaguely curious about the etiquette. Did people only work on the puzzle one at a time? If you group like pieces together, are you helping progress the problem solving process or are you potentially hiding a piece needed elsewhere? Like I said, I had questions.

Well, as it turns out, someone did this on a team of my recently. So, I now have answers to some of these questions. First off, it's surprisingly fun to see it come together. It also gives all of us something to work on, so there's a bit of a shared foxhole mentality. I also discovered that it was perfectly acceptable for multiple people to congregate around the puzzle, though it's usually rare to see more than three people at once. The lack of space and access to pieces sort of limits the practicality.

The most interesting bit, though, comes from the fact that we're starting to make enough progress where the end is in sight. It's not actually done, but it wouldn't surprise me if the puzzle was finished in the next week or two. If one puzzle is fun, two should be more fun, right?

Well, this led to questions about whether the next puzzle should be harder. There are plenty of ways to up the degree of difficulty; you can find puzzles without straight edges as the borders, you can find ones where a color appears all over the place, or you can find ones with few defining characteristics. All of these make it harder to find pieces that actually fit together, and ultimately slow down the puzzle-solving process.

This reminded me of a puzzle that my siblings and I got as kids. I don't remember who got it for us, but I definitely remember the puzzle:
In retrospect, I wonder what the adult who purchased this was thinking
Yeah, there's a reason why I remember that particular puzzle. I'm pretty sure we never put the whole thing together. I suspect we just didn't have the patience for it.

I have mentioned this puzzle to a couple of coworkers, and they have always chuckled and shaken their heads when seeing this picture. The best part, however, comes from the fact that my sister recently decided to take a second crack at this puzzle. Yup, she's going to take this bad boy down. I'm totally rooting for her. That puzzle mocked us for far too many hours for me not to root for anyone who takes it on.

Here's hoping that the puzzle gods look kindly on my sister.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Backlog

I am an information junkie. Always have been. I'm one of those people that cares far more about the storyline in a video game than the actual game play. At work, I will spend time researching things related to solved problems, because I want to know exactly why it failed in the first place. And if someone learns something new, I want to go see what it's about, because I want to know what they know. I know it's not exactly the average outlook on life, but it is what it is. Anyhow, this mentality leads to my habit of tracking various websites, blogs, and other internet web sources to keep my information flow constant. Doing all of this manually is tedious at best, though, so I use Google Reader  to organize all of these feeds. It just makes things simpler to have a single source of RSS feeds, so that I can quickly browse through items related to my interests. Given all of that, it should come as no surprise that I also try to keep up with my feeds on a regular basis. I ...

Moment of Truth

I forget where I first heard it (I think it might have been Descartes), but I have long been a fan of the notion that certain things just have a " ring of truth " to them. If you've never heard the idiom before, the basic idea is that some things are super-true. They are not just true, but they are so obviously true, that as soon as you hear them, you recognize the truthiness inherent in them. I usually get excited when I hear one of these, since it means that I am a tiny bit less ignorant from that moment forward. For the first time in memory, though, I experienced the ring of truth. First, let me paint the scene with a little bit of background. I'd made plans to have dinner with my friend, but we'd agreed to play it by ear. The end result was that we ended up settling on a pretty late dinner in a local spot. That worked out just fine, since we weren't shooting for gourmet, we just wanted to grab some food and catch up in the process. So, we headed out to ...

Units of Measure

I mentioned it recently, but I have a bit of an opinion about valid units of measure. Specifically, I am a fan of the metric system when it comes to temperature . As I mentioned in that post, a system that tells me that the temperature is "negative four degrees" is much better at explaining that it is flippin' cold than one that tells me the temperature is "twenty four degrees." The negative sign matters. Now, as soon as I mentally conceded that the metric system made a ton of sense for temperature, I immediately started thinking that it probably makes sense for other units, as well. I mean, if I'm going to apply the whole "this just makes sense" standard to the ambient temperature, it makes sense to think about mass, volume, and length in the same general way. Why force people to remember that there are sixteen ounces in a pound? Or that, more confusingly, there are eight  fluid  ounces in a cup? The conversion rates just seem arbitrary at that ...