Skip to main content

Pain Scale

Whenever you go to the doctor and complain about pain, they ask you to rate how bad the pain is on a scale from 1 to 10. This is largely due to the fact that there is no way to objectively measure the pain (#5 in the linked article covers this one). I don't know enough of the science behind it, but I imagine that everyone's body reacts differently to stimulus (different muscles, different chemical responses, different everything, really). Worse yet, everyone's pain tolerance is different, often wildly so. Keep that last part in mind, it's going to be important in a little bit.

A while ago, I was talking to the Mild Ex about some of the folks she works with, and she was joking about how guys are all wusses. None of the guys wanted anything to do with needles and shots, apparently. She went down the list, and all of them refused. The very first woman she asked, however, happily agreed. Translation: guys are wusses.

As it turns out, I don't necessarily disagree. Based on what I understand of the process, that whole childbirth thing is a doozy. No guy I know would handle that kind of pain very well. Sure, we're taught to be stoic and to shrug off little aches and pains, but our pain tolerance is only so high. We just don't do very well on the high end of the pain scale. Or, as someone once famously said, "I don't know why they tell guys to grow a pair. Those things are sensitive and weak. They should tell them to grow a vagina. Those things can take a pounding."

The flip side of that, of course, is that us guys shrug off a lot of little things. I remember rolling my ankle and stubbing my fingers roughly a bajillion times playing basketball as a kid. A bunch of us did; it was just part of the game. We didn't talk about it much, though. You'd incur a minor injury, try to walk it off a little bit or shake it off, and then continue playing as if nothing had happened. You knew someone had actually hurt themselves if they actually complained about it. I know a bunch of my female friends marveled at why we'd put ourselves through that (it was fun). So, despite our poor showing at the high end of the pain scale, guys seem to do better at the low end of the scale.

All of this leads me to propose my pain scale translation for guys theory. It's a little bit like the "rule of three" in the old American Pie movies. Whenever a guy gives you a number on the pain scale, that's not the actual number. Instead, you have to realize that the guy pain scale really only goes from what would objectively be a 2 to a 5. Anything above a 5 is "ow ow ow ow" to us anyway, so asking for a number above there is a little bit like asking us to guess the distance from here to Jupiter. The scale is so large that we have no good way of estimating a value. Similarly, anything below a 2 isn't something that we recognize as pain. That's more like "huh, that's annoying."

So if you're asking a guy to give you a number on the pain scale, you're realistically asking him to tell you where on the scale between 2 and 5 he lies. In short, our scale is compressed. So, whatever number the guy tells you, divide it by 3, and then add 2 to it. That's the actual number on the pain scale that corresponds to what he's feeling. Let's do a little quick math: if a guy tells you that he's feeling a 10 on the pain scale, that actually corresponds to a 5.33 (2 + 10/3). Since both numbers fall into "ow ow ow" territory anyway, that checks out. On the low side, say that a guy tells you that he's feeling a 1 on the pain scale. That works out to a 2.33 (2 + 1/3), which is just barely painful enough for a guy to mention it in the first place. Interestingly enough, a 3 is 3 no matter what (2 + 3/3 = 3), so you might even get a "true" number by accident using this scale.

All in all, the logic seems to check out. My number translation theory can generate a reasonable response on both the low end and the high end, and even a number that matches up with what the guy actually says under the right circumstances. Sounds right to me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pink

Way back in high school, there was a male teacher that all the girls thought was attractive. It was an open secret that a bunch of them had crushes on him. In fact, the school newspaper even did an article about him that quoted some girl saying, "he's so cute, he even makes pink look good." Yes, he had worn a pink shirt to school one day, and it had apparently been a big hit. I was reminded of this story when my sister-in-law suggested that she would choose pink as the color for her wedding and bridal party. I don't think I've ever made a color look good before, but I remember thinking, "well, I know it's possible to not look stupid in pink as a straight guy, I guess I can try." And I think that's almost exactly what I told her. I also happened to own a gray suit, so I figured the combination would look all right. However, I was pretty much the only one willing to play along. My sister-in-law's brothers wanted absolutely no part of th...

Dreams

Normally, I don't eat very many sweets. I tend to eat pretty generous portions, but I generally prefer savory food over sweet. In fact, I usually prefer things half as sweet when possible. My preference doesn't have anything to do with health reasons, it's just one of those things that I've always liked better. That said, I do inevitably eat dessert, particularly if I'm out with other people. My stance towards dessert is roughly equivalent to those who are social drinkers . If other people want to munch on something for dessert, I'm not about to cross my arms and refuse. That'd be just a tad gauche. So, I do eat some dessert. I even have a few standby favorites that I'll usually order when presented with them (brownies, creme brulee, and apple pie). But left to my own devices, I'm not about to go hunting for dessert. Apparently, this means that the sugar can really mess with my system under the right circumstances. As I've discovered, ...

New York City Trip (Day 1)

After my crappy flight , I was now in Newark, New Jersey at 7AM on a Friday morning. I had done a little bit of reading up, so I knew which bus I needed to take and where I was going to get off. All in all, getting into the city was surprisingly easy. I suppose speaking the language does make things simpler. Through no real planning of mine (a theme of the trip, at least on my part), I picked one of the later bus stops at which to get off, Grand Central. I actually just figured that getting off at Grand Central would give me options, and heck, it's called Grand Central. That just screamed "decent place to disembark that might be close to some stuff" to me, so that's where I got off. However, it also meant that we drove down 42 nd St to get to my bus stop. That just happens to be a big street, and it gave me a glimpse of Times Square as we drove by. My bus stop choice had accidentally given me a rough layout of the city. Go me. I had about 6 hours to kill...