Skip to main content

(Fantasy) Game On 4

It's that time of year again when footballs are flying. Yup, the NFL is back.

Actually, it has been for a few months now. So, you might be curious why I bring it up at this particular moment. Well, we've been playing fantasy football again this season, so there's another amusing story.

First of all, I should mention that the Mild Wife and I aren't doing as well this year as last year. We're both somewhere near the middle of the pack, but we both had a pretty bad start to the year. I think at one point, I was at the bottom of the standings. What can I say? Some years, you just have some bad luck.

Now, it's not like I can personally give these guys pep talks or otherwise control their performance, either. Ultimately, I just have to pick players and hope for the best. Even players who everyone expects to perform admirably sometimes have off years, so there's definitely an element of luck to the whole thing.

Still, that hasn't stopped a whole industry from popping up around this hobby. As of four years ago, the industry was estimated to be worth about $70 billion dollars. And I'm absolutely positive that the industry has only grown since then. Given that, it shouldn't surprise you that people run all sorts of statistical models and try to wean numerical advantages from these fantasy teams. Seriously. I know a few people who actually do this. They are very smart, very competitive people that happen to like fantasy football.

The sites that run fantasy football leagues can do this, too, so they tend to provide some of this analysis for their players. It helps remove the barrier to entry, so everyone can feel like they can play and have a shot to win. From a pure business perspective, it's smart. It widens the pool of people who want to play.

Now, remember that the Mild Wife was new to the whole fantasy football thing last year. She was precisely the sort of person that would benefit from the industry-provided projections and statistical analysis. If you remember the post from last year, that's what she did. In fact, she rode those projections to the top of the standings and to an ultimate championship in her rookie year. Yup, she won the whole darn thing.

As I mentioned, however, this year is a different story. That's led to my favorite remark about the different outcomes this year:

Mild Wife: "Whoever is doing the projections this year is no good. They need to bring back last year's person."

I burst out laughing when I heard that. Clearly, she's grasped the value of using data science to win at fantasy football. Incidentally, if any of you are up-and-coming data scientists, might I suggest a future with ESPN's fantasy football division?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Backlog

I am an information junkie. Always have been. I'm one of those people that cares far more about the storyline in a video game than the actual game play. At work, I will spend time researching things related to solved problems, because I want to know exactly why it failed in the first place. And if someone learns something new, I want to go see what it's about, because I want to know what they know. I know it's not exactly the average outlook on life, but it is what it is. Anyhow, this mentality leads to my habit of tracking various websites, blogs, and other internet web sources to keep my information flow constant. Doing all of this manually is tedious at best, though, so I use Google Reader  to organize all of these feeds. It just makes things simpler to have a single source of RSS feeds, so that I can quickly browse through items related to my interests. Given all of that, it should come as no surprise that I also try to keep up with my feeds on a regular basis. I ...

Moment of Truth

I forget where I first heard it (I think it might have been Descartes), but I have long been a fan of the notion that certain things just have a " ring of truth " to them. If you've never heard the idiom before, the basic idea is that some things are super-true. They are not just true, but they are so obviously true, that as soon as you hear them, you recognize the truthiness inherent in them. I usually get excited when I hear one of these, since it means that I am a tiny bit less ignorant from that moment forward. For the first time in memory, though, I experienced the ring of truth. First, let me paint the scene with a little bit of background. I'd made plans to have dinner with my friend, but we'd agreed to play it by ear. The end result was that we ended up settling on a pretty late dinner in a local spot. That worked out just fine, since we weren't shooting for gourmet, we just wanted to grab some food and catch up in the process. So, we headed out to ...

Units of Measure

I mentioned it recently, but I have a bit of an opinion about valid units of measure. Specifically, I am a fan of the metric system when it comes to temperature . As I mentioned in that post, a system that tells me that the temperature is "negative four degrees" is much better at explaining that it is flippin' cold than one that tells me the temperature is "twenty four degrees." The negative sign matters. Now, as soon as I mentally conceded that the metric system made a ton of sense for temperature, I immediately started thinking that it probably makes sense for other units, as well. I mean, if I'm going to apply the whole "this just makes sense" standard to the ambient temperature, it makes sense to think about mass, volume, and length in the same general way. Why force people to remember that there are sixteen ounces in a pound? Or that, more confusingly, there are eight  fluid  ounces in a cup? The conversion rates just seem arbitrary at that ...